[OSM-talk] route=road - What's that all about then?

Janko Mihelić janjko at gmail.com
Thu Aug 21 21:36:16 UTC 2014


I agree it's double information. But if you ask me, the ref tags on ways
should be deleted, and route relations can be used as information for
highway refs. This makes sense because you can have more than one route on
one way.

P.S. I think this is for the tagging mailing list.


Janko


2014-08-21 20:20 GMT+02:00 Dave F. <davefox at madasafish.com>:

> Hi
>
> http://ra.osmsurround.org/analyzeRelation?relationId=18159&_noCache=on
>
> This route relation appears to be just for the B3070. Isn't that a waste
> of time as it's covered by the ref tags on the ways?
>
> I thought route relations were a way to allow tagging of journeys taken
> over numerous types of ways. Any reason why I shouldn't delete it?
>
> Dave F.
>
> ---
> This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus
> protection is active.
> http://www.avast.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> talk at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20140821/096f52b2/attachment.html>


More information about the talk mailing list