[OSM-talk] Detrimental to the OSM database
Mike Thompson
miketho16 at gmail.com
Sat Aug 23 02:58:57 UTC 2014
In almost all other science and technology fields we use instrumentation to
allow us to "see" what would otherwise be too dangerous, expensive or just
impossible to see with our unaided human senses. Mapping is no different.
We use satellite (more generically overhead) imagery to "see" areas where
it would be too expensive, time consuming or in some cases dangerous for us
to travel to in person.
There is nothing wrong with overhead imagery. One must just not use it
beyond its limits. There are going to be some things that are not obvious
and crystal clear from overhead imagery, assumptions should not be made in
these cases, and those things should not be mapped based on this one source
alone..
Mike
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 8:40 PM, Jóhannes Birgir Jensson <joi at betra.is>
wrote:
>
> Þann 23.8.2014 01:03, skrifaði Dave F.:
>
>
>
> http://maproulette.org/#t=osmose-8170-147-soccer/osmose-8170-147-soccer-None-d19295cc3e005283ae80b66bde86f474
> Supposed missing soccer pitch in France. I mean, really?
>
> I believe these sites add more inaccuracy than accuracy.
>
>
> Hello Dave. On the contrary I've tried the soccer pitch thing and so far
> out of around 50 I've drawn only 1 was not a soccer pitch, the rest were
> all very obvious soccer pitches with goals, lines and everything.
>
> Knock it after you try it.
>
> --Jói
>
> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> talk at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20140822/d0813174/attachment.html>
More information about the talk
mailing list