[OSM-talk] [OSM-dev] Moving to stricter multipolygon parsing

[John Packer]

Context for this discussion can be seen here:
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/dev/2014-June/027910.html


2014-06-13 11:51 GMT-03:00 JB <jbosm at mailoo.org>:

>  (not sure this is really a good idea, leaving dev decide on their side…
> This is how you sometimes end with something users won't want to use…
> JB.)
>
>
> Le 13/06/2014 16:26, Yves a écrit :
>
> Thing is, it may be easier to find a consensus in -dev than elsewhere.
> So a fixing list would be a good thing, indeed.
> Yves
>
> On 13 juin 2014 16:20:09 UTC+02:00, Holger Jeromin <mailgmane at katur.de>
> <mailgmane at katur.de> wrote:
>>
>> Paul Norman schrieb am 13.06.2014 01:25:
>>
>>>
>>>  To support this, I looked for some numbers. Using a shortened deleted tags
>>>  list, there are 1 million new-style and 261k old-style MPs. Of the
>>>  old-style,
>>>  256k have a member with role outer. 251k of these have entirely consistent
>>>  tags on outers, while 2.3k have two sets of tags among the ways. About 180
>>>  have three or more.[3] An old-style MP without entirely consistent tags on
>>>  outers is ambiguous and in error.
>>
>>
>> To support this change it would be nice to setup a list on the web with
>> the buggy relations. A few ten thousands broken Wikipedia tags were
>> corrected with such a list.
>>
>> Perhaps the change could be enforced later, after a lot of MPs are
>> corrected.
>>
>>
> --
> Envoyé de mon téléphone Android avec K-9 Mail. Excusez la brièveté.
>
> _______________________________________________
> dev mailing listdev at openstreetmap.orghttps://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> talk at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20140613/088fb447/attachment.html>