[OSM-talk] landuse=port_terminal etc. to landuse=port changes

sabas88 sabas88 at gmail.com
Tue Mar 25 16:38:57 UTC 2014


2014-03-25 17:23 GMT+01:00 SomeoneElse <lists at mail.atownsend.org.uk>:

> (just something that I noticed while checking for local overlapping
> changesets)
>
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/20990644
>
> seems to have made a number of "tag merges" to "landuse=port".
>
> Apologies for the noise if it's already been discussed and agreed on an
> import list somewhere; just mentioning it in case someone was relying on
> the tags that have been removed and wasn't expecting the changes.
>
>
Hi Andy,
I did the manually via JOSM.
I found different uses (port,port_terminal and variations) and merged
together. In Europe I was using it mostly, and migrated to the formal
proposal[0] [1], the others were:
- one in USA which fitted my proposal and I adjusted it
- the others were delimitations of port subareas and fitted the definition
(were untouched by some time and I tried to improve the geometry).

I'd like to move the set of proposals to voting one of these days, but
haven't had the time yet.

Cheers,
>
> Andy
>

Regards,
Stefano

[0] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/landuse%3Dport
[1]
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/RFC-Classification-for-ports-and-inland-terminals-td5792661.html

> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> talk at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20140325/e2d7a5d7/attachment.html>


More information about the talk mailing list