[OSM-talk] OSM France "BANO" project... openaddresses in France

[Tobias Knerr]

On 15.05.2014 15:41, JB wrote:
> This is not done, and I certainly hope that the « community » does not
> take it for granted before a hypothetical future vote.
> And that if an actual vote takes place, a real debate also takes place,
> with real counter-arguments replied to the already heard arguments.
> JB.

What is the "this" in your reply? I'm not sure whether you are assuring
me that no ODbL data will be imported into OSM or claiming that OSM will
never change its license again.

The relicensing clause is there for a reason: The community in 10 years
will mostly consist of completely different persons than today. And
*they* should be able to determine what OSM's license will be in 10
years. Limiting their choices in order to slightly speed up the
completion of house number mapping today would be not be wise.