[OSM-talk] The world’s best addressable map
clifford at snowandsnow.us
Wed Oct 22 18:28:39 UTC 2014
Steve Coast suggested changing the mission statement of OSM to be something
like “The world’s best addressable map” I thought I'd separate out this
into a new thread. As some backup, I attended my first SOTM-US in 2012
where Steve proposed we build an addressable map. A group of us from
Seattle decided that we'd take that challenge and import addresses for
Seattle. That import was completed.
Here are the address related comments:
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 4:37 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com
> 2014-10-22 12:15 GMT+02:00 Steve Coast <steve at asklater.com>:
>> Together, we could do this in 6-12 months and finish addressing in 1-3
>> years. At that point we wouldn’t have just made the world slightly better,
>> we would have put a big dent in the universe. Nobody would use a closed map
>> ever again, and it would be people like you that made it happen.
> I agree with you that addressing is very important for a lot of commercial
> (and non-commercial) map users. What I don't understand is how a paid board
> would help us map more addresses. Unfortunately mapping addresses is
> typically less fun than going to the video arcade. Looking at the current
> figures we are not doing too bad. Currently there are 130 Million buildings
> in OSM and 46 Million housenumbers. I don't know exactly how many buildings
> there are in the world, and how many of them don't have addresses, but I
> guess it will be at least 1 Billion addresses in the world, probably more.
> According to the stats page we have roughly 25.000 active contributors a
> month ( http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Stats#Contributor_Stats ). To
> get an address on all currently mapped buildings in three years time, (84M
> to go), every active contributor would have to add 93 addresses a month -
> constantly. To get 1 Billion addresses mapped by 25.000 contributors in 3
> yrs, it would be 1111 housenumbers a month per active contributor. Are we
> planning to pay the mappers as well? The only solution seems to get more
> contributors mapping, and have them insert addresses.
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 4:59 AM, Marc Gemis <marc.gemis at gmail.com> wrote:
> It would be nice to know how many of the buildings and house numbers in
> OSM were imported versus surveyed / drawn by hand. I have a bad feeling
> about how feasible it is to crowd surf house numbers.
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 5:04 AM, Oleksiy Muzalyev <
oleksiy.muzalyev at bluewin.ch> wrote:
> It is not necessary to put down a number on each building. It is possible
> to use *addr:interpolation* (*odd, even*, or *all*).
> We put down a number on the first building, then on the last, connect them
> in JOSM, and add *addr:interpolation: all *. For example here:
> http://osm.org/go/0CFn0AZ_d--?m= . It is also very useful on a street
> with many small houses. And it is searchable. For example if there is
> number 15 and number 27 on the map for a street, and they are connected
> with *addr:interpolation: odd, *and if one searches number 21, the map
> will show the number 21 all right.
> Then, there is another approach. We first map addressable large building,
> where a lot of people live or work. Kind of of going after the low-hanging
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 5:06 AM, Matthijs Melissen <info at matthijsmelissen.nl
> On 22 October 2014 12:37, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com>
> > Currently there are 130 Million buildings
> > in OSM and 46 Million housenumbers.
> Do we know how many of these addresses come from imports? I wouldn't
> be surprised if over 90% of the housenumbers in OSM come from imports.
> The Dutch BAG import accounts for 8 million adresses, and the Czech
> RUIAN import accounts for 3 million addresses. Then there have also
> been large imports at least in Germany, Poland, and France, but for
> these countries I can't find exact numbers.
OpenStreetMap: Maps with a human touch
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the talk