[OSM-talk] bicycle=no and cycleway=lane conflicting?
craigw84 at fastmail.fm
Thu Apr 9 16:54:00 UTC 2015
On 2015-04-09 14:00, Phil Endecott wrote:
> Maarten Deen wrote:
>> I came across this example  where a way has bicycle=no and
>> IMHO these two tags are also conflicting and the bicycle=no should be
>> removed. Any thoughts?
> "Cycle lanes" that you cannot, either practically or legally, cycle
> along are horribly common. Examples:
> How would you tag those?
> I have no idea if your example falls into that category, is mis-tagged,
> or what.
2 of those are not cycle lanes - the 1st and 3rd are paths separate from
the road. But they are also part of an NCN cycle route.
So they could be tagged as highway=path (or highway=footway), with
bicycle=no, plus maybe something like bicycle:pushing=yes. Plus adding
them to the route relation.
I'm not sure what is happening with the second photo, is their a cycle
lane marked on the road or not?
More information about the talk