[OSM-talk] [talk] bicycle=no and cycleway=lane conflicting?

[Volker Schmidt]

1) For me there is no a-priori conflict: according to the tagging, this is
a pedestrian street, where you cannot ride your bicycle, except on a cycle
lane which is somewhere on this pedestrian street. Why should a pedestrian
street not have a bicycle lane like any other street.
Or am I missing something?

2) have you talked to the user mritz who put the bicycle=no tag there? He
may know the local situation.

Volker

Padova, Italy

>
>
> Message: 8
> Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2015 10:03:42 +0200
> From: Maarten Deen <mdeen at xs4all.nl>
> To: talk at openstreetmap.org
> Subject: [OSM-talk] bicycle=no and cycleway=lane conflicting?
> Message-ID: <9be720d7ddc344ffa3a382b224a4d7d5 at xs4all.nl>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
>
> I came across this example [1] where a way has bicycle=no and
> cycleway=lane. I was using brouter [2] for some bicyclerouting and one
> of the rules for bikerouting there is that bicycle=no means no bicycles
> are allowed.
> IMHO these two tags are also conflicting and the bicycle=no should be
> removed. Any thoughts?
>
> [1] <https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/12823327>
> [2] <http://brouter.de/brouter-web/>
>
> Maarten
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 9
> Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2015 11:51:34 +0200
> From: Mateusz Konieczny <matkoniecz at gmail.com>
> To: talk at openstreetmap.org
> Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] bicycle=no and cycleway=lane conflicting?
> Message-ID: <20150409115134.7b67a6d2 at Grisznak>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
>
> [bicycle=no; cycleway=lane] means that there is a lane for bicycles but
> cycling is anyway not allowed there.
>
> Typically it would be a tagging mistake, usable cycleway lanes should
> be tagged as [cycleway=lane].
>
> On Thu, 09 Apr 2015 10:03:42 +0200
> Maarten Deen <mdeen at xs4all.nl> wrote:
>
> > I came across this example [1] where a way has bicycle=no and
> > cycleway=lane. I was using brouter [2] for some bicyclerouting and
> > one of the rules for bikerouting there is that bicycle=no means no
> > bicycles are allowed.
> > IMHO these two tags are also conflicting and the bicycle=no should be
> > removed. Any thoughts?
> >
> > [1] <https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/12823327>
> > [2] <http://brouter.de/brouter-web/>
> >
> > Maarten
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > talk mailing list
> > talk at openstreetmap.org
> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Subject: Digest Footer
>
> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> talk at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> End of talk Digest, Vol 128, Issue 6
> ************************************
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20150409/56e4e525/attachment.html>