[OSM-talk] stop deleting abandoned railroads
61sundowner at gmail.com
Thu Aug 13 11:54:39 UTC 2015
Snipped for PC below, meanings remain.
On 13/08/2015 9:30 PM, Ian Dees wrote:
> I appreciate that there are strong feelings about this topic, but we
> could certainly use more constructive language and have a civilized
Passion is what can make a good mapper. But keep it in perspective people.
> Please reconsider your approach here, Russ.
> On Aug 13, 2015 1:01 AM, "Russ Nelson" <nelson at crynwr.com
> <mailto:nelson at crynwr.com>> wrote:
> Frederik Ramm writes:
> > Hi,
> > On 08/11/2015 07:09 AM, Russ Nelson wrote:
> > > If you have
> > > ever said "delete things you don't see", then
> > > you are making the map worse. Just stop!
> > Delete things you don't see (with some notable exceptions,
> > railways not being among them).
> Yep. You're one of the people. I wasn't
> going to name names -- thank you for fingering yourself as one of the
> guilty parties. Thanks for your cooperation in ceasing this practice,
> I really appreciate your help.
I have deleted things I did not see. For years I passed that spot and
never saw these things....
One day I went there to do some mapping not just passing.. those thing I
deleted .. they were there!!!!
So I put them back... but I hope I learnt a lesson.. if there is
something in OSM;
I really should not deleted it/them.
I can change the tags, and certainly add notes, fixmes ... but not
remove unless I'm absolutely certain that the information can never be
used in the future!
For example a demolished building .. may have a new building built on
the same spot .. with the same outline.
Leave the node data in OSM, change the tag building=yes to
building=demolished (may not be rendered nor official OSM tagging) add a
note as to who/why ..
and then if rebuilt change the tag back to building=yes... with a source
If the site has a different shaped building then the nodes will have to
be changed, or the site gets used for something else .. then change it.
But untill then leave the old data there.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the talk