[OSM-talk] OpenStreetMap Carto v2.33.0 release

[Martin Koppenhoefer]

sent from a phone

> Am 15.08.2015 um 13:50 schrieb Christoph Hormann <chris_hormann at gmx.de>:
> 
> The question is how much is actually gained from this when 
> landuse=forest and natural=wood are practically identical anyway and 
> mean the same, namely 'this area is densely covered by trees'.  
> Rendering landcover=trees as well would just further fragment tagging.  


IMHO it would rather encourage mappers to make more sense out of these than it is now. I'm myself adding a pointless landuse=forest for every landcover=trees now (for the renderer), and I guess most other mappers do the same. I will remove them from non-forests as soon as the landcover tag becomes visible