[OSM-talk] landcover=trees

Daniel Koć daniel at xn--ko-wla.pl
Sat Aug 15 15:13:50 UTC 2015

W dniu 15.08.2015 15:16, Martin Koppenhoefer napisał(a):

> IMHO it would rather encourage mappers to make more sense out of these
> than it is now. I'm myself adding a pointless landuse=forest for every
> landcover=trees now (for the renderer), and I guess most other mappers
> do the same. I will remove them from non-forests as soon as the
> landcover tag becomes visible

I asked about it here:


but the issue is closed now without too detailed discussion. I guess we 
should at least create specific Wiki page to document it and try to 
define how it should be used, but I had no time to touch it and nobody 
else did it too.

I think after that I can open simple PR, so we can discuss it in detail.

"The train is always on time / The trick is to be ready to put your bags 
down" [A. Cohen]

More information about the talk mailing list