[OSM-talk] landcover=trees [was Re: OpenStreetMap Carto v2.33.0 release]
61sundowner at gmail.com
Mon Aug 17 11:20:43 UTC 2015
On 17/08/2015 7:20 PM, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
> In that case it is perfectly OK to do not edit map and keep it as it
> was (yes, as I
> understand it and it seems to be a widely used in this way -
> landuse=wood, natural=wood,
> landcover=trees are used currently for the same objects).
Err disagree, they are not the same.
To me "landuse=wood" (or landuse=forestry) imply that the area is used
to produce wood products.
There are areas that have trees .. that are NOT used to produce wood.
Here I would use natural=wood (or tree/s), landcover=trees.
> Probably landuse=forestry and landcover=trees would be a good idea and
> I would
> support such proposal.
> 2015-08-17 10:58 GMT+02:00 Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com
> <mailto:dieterdreist at gmail.com>>:
> sent from a phone
> > Am 17.08.2015 um 01:30 schrieb Mateusz Konieczny
> <matkoniecz at gmail.com <mailto:matkoniecz at gmail.com>>:
> > I am not aware about values that should be used in that case.
> you are saying that landuse=forest is not a good tag to describe
> an area where trees have just been logged and will soon be planted
> talk mailing list
> talk at openstreetmap.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the talk