[OSM-talk] landcover=trees [was Re: OpenStreetMap Carto v2.33.0 release]

Mateusz Konieczny matkoniecz at gmail.com
Mon Aug 17 09:20:46 UTC 2015


In that case it is perfectly OK to do not edit map and keep it as it was
(yes, as I
understand it and it seems to be a widely used in this way - landuse=wood,
natural=wood,
landcover=trees are used currently for the same objects).

Probably landuse=forestry and landcover=trees would be a good idea and I
would
support such proposal.

2015-08-17 10:58 GMT+02:00 Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com>:

>
>
> sent from a phone
>
> > Am 17.08.2015 um 01:30 schrieb Mateusz Konieczny <matkoniecz at gmail.com>:
> >
> > I am not aware about values that should be used in that case.
>
>
> you are saying that landuse=forest is not a good tag to describe an area
> where trees have just been logged and will soon be planted again?
>
>
> cheers
> Martin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20150817/def90e16/attachment.html>


More information about the talk mailing list