[OSM-talk] "guide to vandalism” in OSM?

[JB]

+1. 

Quite funny actually that the parallel discussion on « how we map »
clearly states : 

In talking to other mappers, always ASSUME GOOD INTENTIONS. 

and drew no bad attention, but does not seems to be accepted for the
notes mappers (meaning creators, as in « I don't know to map, adding a
note is here for me »). Do that mean that anonymous notes should just
not be allowed ? 

(TLDR: also quite funny that on the discussion on importing the
bicycle_repair_station on talk and import, the note db could be imported
into with little regard to quality, but not the main one. Still
wondering if this note db is just considered a shitty one somewhere that
no one wants to see.) 

Le 12.02.2015 15:46, Michał Brzozowski a écrit : 

> I happen to fix a lot of notes in Poland.
> For me it would be impractical to check every POI that I add from notes.
> Mind you, I do the research in the Internet if it's a feature that
> could possibly have a website (fire station, church, restaurant,
> supermarket etc), but the only way to check some (eg. smaller shops)
> would be to check on the ground. Unless there's a mapper in every
> single municipality it's not practical to do so - drive a long way to
> just check "yep, it's there". Therefore sometimes I simply assume good
> faith which in my opinion *is* sensible. But I mark any changesets or
> POIs with source=notes.
> 
> Michał
> 
> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> talk at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk [1]
 

Links:
------
[1] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20150212/fc4c9c48/attachment-0001.html>