[OSM-talk] Routing on osm.org

[Mateusz Konieczny]

> The bicycle router seems to give same result as car router in my area?

Also for me, bicycle routers seem unable to avoid major roads. Terrible
compared to http://brouter.de/brouter-web/.

PS: Please, send unformatted test to mailing list.

2015-02-17 4:00 GMT+01:00 Jóhannes Birgir Jensson <joi at betra.is>:

>  Adding surface tags sounds more like an upgrade than an outbreak.
> Tagging for the router surely means that you are tagging roads based on
> their finer properties, single-lane or dual-lane, asphalt or gravel etc.
>
> Also if the road is less traveled it sounds like a no-brainer to tag it as
> unclassified instead of tertiary?
>
> The bicycle router seems to give same result as car router in my area?
>
>
>  Þann 17.2.2015 00:14, skrifaði Jo Walsh:
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 16, 2015, at 08:19 PM, Colin Smale wrote:
>
> +1 to that! Hope it doesn't lead to an outbreak of "tagging for the
> router" though... You know, down/upgrading roads to "improve" the results...
>
> Anecdatally, I would say that outbreak is well in hand already :/
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing listtalk at openstreetmap.orghttps://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> talk at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20150217/e777f3a4/attachment.html>