[OSM-talk] Routing on osm.org
Jóhannes Birgir Jensson
joi at betra.is
Tue Feb 17 03:00:36 UTC 2015
Adding surface tags sounds more like an upgrade than an outbreak.
Tagging for the router surely means that you are tagging roads based on
their finer properties, single-lane or dual-lane, asphalt or gravel etc.
Also if the road is less traveled it sounds like a no-brainer to tag it
as unclassified instead of tertiary?
The bicycle router seems to give same result as car router in my area?
Þann 17.2.2015 00:14, skrifaði Jo Walsh:
> On Mon, Feb 16, 2015, at 08:19 PM, Colin Smale wrote:
>>
>> +1 to that! Hope it doesn't lead to an outbreak of "tagging for the
>> router" though... You know, down/upgrading roads to "improve" the
>> results...
>>
> Anecdatally, I would say that outbreak is well in hand already :/
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> talk at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20150217/714468e4/attachment.html>
More information about the talk
mailing list