[OSM-talk] Big Lakes
malenki
osm_ at malenki.ch
Thu Feb 19 11:19:05 UTC 2015
On Thu, 19 Feb 2015 04:29:53 +0100,
Paul Norman wrote:
> The Great Lakes have been discussed a few times on the local lists
> and the conclusion has been arrived at that they are best represented
> with natural=coastline.
Could you give a short overview of the reasoning leading to the
decision?
I am fine with it and would be glad if Lake Nasser could be
mapped this way, too, because of the big amount of Relation Members.
But since the Great Lakes are mapped with coastlines: what are the MPs
good for?
The collection relations I removed yesterday.
More information about the talk
mailing list