[OSM-talk] [Imports] amenity=bicycle_repair_station :::: only 18 so far

[Jo]

It would indeed be preferable to use OSM Notes for that purpose.

Jo

2015-01-26 17:37 GMT+01:00 Bryce Nesbitt <bryce2 at obviously.com>:

> On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 1:13 AM, Philip Barnes <phil at trigpoint.me.uk>
> wrote:
>
>> On Mon Jan 26 07:37:57 2015 GMT, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
>> >
>> >> The locations I field checked were all findable, but had positioning
>> errors
>> >> consistent with smartphone GPS units,
>> >> up to 30 meters.  In each case I was able to find the station in a
>> field
>> > I think this is a good example of where notes are the way to go. A
>> badly positioned node is only likely to be spotted by a mapper who is
>> specifically interested in bike repair stations, whereas a note will be
>> spotted and acted upon by a more general mapper visiting an area. The note
>> can contain info on how to tag or a reference to one that has been properly
>> surveyed.
>>
>
> It seems messy, but I could import the 500 repair stations each with a
> 'note' that says it needs field checking.
> Would people really want that?
>
> ---
>
> This still won't find all the wacky ways people have tagged existing
> stations (e.g. bike rack with capacity zero).  But
> might focus attention on the bike infrastructure in the area of the note.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Imports mailing list
> Imports at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20150126/c6b278fc/attachment.html>