[OSM-talk] waterway - "routable network" and reservoirs/lakes
colin.smale at xs4all.nl
Tue Jul 28 10:48:11 UTC 2015
Hi Christoph, my suggestion was to clearly separate the subject of water flow from the subject of routing. Whether roads are mostly bidirectional or not is irrelevant I think, as routers have to be able to handle one-way roads anyway. If I understand it right, edges in routing graphs are often one-way anyway as the characteristics from A to B may be different from B to A.
If you are interested in hydrodynamics on a large scale, like predicting the route an unpowered floating object would take, that is entirely different to the use of a routing engine to suggest a route to the skipper of a boat.
Simply adding a way from one side of a lake to the other to stop some QA program complaining is bordering on tagging for the renderer...
On 28 July 2015 11:17:00 CEST, Christoph Hormann <chris_hormann at gmx.de> wrote:
>On Tuesday 28 July 2015, Colin Smale wrote:
>> If we can separate the flow direction discussion from the routing,
>> the latter becomes a more generic "routing through areas" problem
>> which has been discussed before in the context of pedestrian routing.
>Water flow structure is not only about flow direction of individual
>segments, it is also about connectivity - hence the routable network.
>And yes, you can try to take polygons into account to determine
>waterflow - you have to at the moment since missing line mapping is
>just too widespread. But for non-trivial polygons (i.e. ones with
>holes or areas represented by multiple polygons) this is generally
>ambiguous and it is hard to analyze as well.
>The analogy between water flow analysis and traffic routing is
>misleading here since traffic routes are mostly bidirectional. If you
>imagine a road network exclusively built from oneway roads you can
>immediately see that having parts of that network represented as
>polygons will make routing difficult.
>And - this is even more important - it also makes it difficult to spot
>errors in mapping. If you have a full line mapping of a river network
>it is very easy to identify problems locally for QA tools or validators
>in editors - just like in case of the coastline. If you rely on
>polygon features creating connectivity in the waterflow network you
>need to analyze it in full before you are able to spot where mapping is
>talk mailing list
>talk at openstreetmap.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the talk