[OSM-talk] Routing Applications

Eugene Alvin Villar seav80 at gmail.com
Wed Jun 17 12:38:20 UTC 2015


This has been fixed in Osmand early this year after being reported
more than 2 years ago. Unfortunately, multiple via ways are still not
supported.
https://code.google.com/p/osmand/issues/detail?id=1729

On 6/17/15, Janko Mihelić <janjko at gmail.com> wrote:
> If you ask me, they are all in their infancy. Non of these routing services
> even route right. In a turn restriction the "via" role can be a way.
> Neither OSRM, ORS or GraphHopper knows how to restrict that, and that's
> IMHO one of the crucial parts of a routing engine.
>
> When one of them starts routing right, than we can talk about picking a
> winner service. Right now only MapQuest knows how to route.
>
> Janko
>
> sri, 17. lip 2015. 05:34 Hans De Kryger <hans.dekryger13 at gmail.com> je
> napisao:
>
>> Why do OSRM & OpenRoutingService compete against each other instead of
>> joining resources and combining efforts to make the best routing service
>> out there? Am i missing something? I know it's nice to have different
>> services for different uses but this doesn't seem like a good use of
>> resources at all. I may be the only one with this opinion, but this has
>> bug
>> me for awhile.
>>
>> *Regards,*
>>
>> *Hans*
>>
>>
>> *http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/TheDutchMan13
>> <http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/TheDutchMan13>*
>>
>> *Sorry for any misspellings*
>>  _______________________________________________
>> talk mailing list
>> talk at openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>>
>



More information about the talk mailing list