[OSM-talk] Layers and landuse
Martin Koppenhoefer
dieterdreist at gmail.com
Sun Jun 28 15:14:57 UTC 2015
2015-06-28 14:39 GMT+02:00 Tobias Knerr <osm at tobias-knerr.de>:
> On 27.06.2015 11:19, michael spreng wrote:
> > This is not a tagging error.
>
> It is an error. Only the underground part of the ditch should have
> layer=-1, and it needs to also have a tunnel tag.
>
> As for landuse, such areas are typically non-physical, and as such not
> easily inserted into the layer hierarchy. However, mappers are using
> landuse far beyond its original definition, and also map physical things
> such as pastures and (arguably) fields with it. At that point, the usual
> layer rules need to apply.
>
>
completely agree. I had written something similar, but accidentally the
mail was only sent to Michael and not to this list...
Cheers,
Martin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20150628/54b281c3/attachment.html>
More information about the talk
mailing list