[OSM-talk] highway=residential_link

Paul Johnson baloo at ursamundi.org
Wed Nov 11 10:33:57 UTC 2015


On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 2:36 AM, Mateusz Konieczny <matkoniecz at gmail.com>
wrote:

> On Mon, 9 Nov 2015 22:36:28 -0500
> Andrew Guertin <andrew.guertin at uvm.edu> wrote:
>
> > So the question is, should uses of highway=residential_link be edited
> > away, should they be left as-is (unless a different highway type is
> > clearly better), or should the tag be approved and documented?
>
> Can somebody give examples of locations where residential_link makes
> sense?


 http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/262287021

No frontage, only exists to tie four ways together around a tree in a
non-roundabout fashion.  Only the highway=residential ways are signed on
the ground.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20151111/145450db/attachment.html>


More information about the talk mailing list