[OSM-talk] Is this good enough attribution for OSM?

[Dave F.]

I had a tweet from the site's creator & he agrees. He said he will add one.

Dave F.

On 24/10/2015 18:14, Mike Thompson wrote:
> Dave,
>
> I think the "Maps © OpenStreetMap <http://openstreetmap.org/copyright> 
> contributors" on the Leaflet page just refers the maps on that page.
>
> Mike
>
> On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 10:25 AM, Dave F. <davefox at madasafish.com 
> <mailto:davefox at madasafish.com>> wrote:
>
>     Hi
>
>     Came across this today: http://geo8.webarch.net/master/
>
>     I'm interested in opinions on whether it's acceptable there's no
>     direct OSM attribution.
>
>     I'm no expert in licensing, but I presume the 'MIT' bit isn't
>     related to Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Is it compatible
>     with OSM's license?
>
>     If you click on the Leaflet attribute, right at the bottom of the
>     page it states: Maps © OpenStreetMap
>     <http://openstreetmap.org/copyright> contributors. To me, that's
>     not good enough.
>
>     Dave F.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>     ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>     Avast logo <https://www.avast.com/antivirus> 	
>
>     This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
>     www.avast.com <https://www.avast.com/antivirus>
>
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     talk mailing list
>     talk at openstreetmap.org <mailto:talk at openstreetmap.org>
>     https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>
>



---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20151026/fa547d12/attachment.html>