[OSM-talk] The wki pages ... for the mapper? or the render? or both?

Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdreist at gmail.com
Thu Sep 10 07:18:37 UTC 2015



sent from a phone

> Am 10.09.2015 um 02:20 schrieb Warin <61sundowner at gmail.com>:
> 
> Using that logic
> 
> a parking area is a property of a parking aisle.
> 
> a fuel station is a property of a driveway.
> 
> and so on.


doesn't seem logical to me, but if you see it like this you might want to propose properties for these ways to add that information.

Like
xy area object tags +
fenced=yes

is an implicit fence (property) and

barrier=fence is an explicit fence (object), and both are valid tags.


> 
> Bridges, tunnel and cuttings are physical objects that have their own properties (names, heights, widths, materials etc)
> that can be independent of whatever else they may be related to.


yes, and to store these own properties in a common way you likely should map these objects on their own.

For a bridge the tag is
man_made=bridge

if we don't have yet tags to map explicit tunnels and cuttings, these could be introduced (maybe there aren't own properties on these objects that mappers so far wanted to map, hence no tags have yet been introduced).

cheers 
Martin 


More information about the talk mailing list