[OSM-talk] [BOT] [RFC]: water surfaces

[Frank Villaro-Dixon]

On 16-03-23 13:24:29, Andy Townsend, wrote 1.0K characters saying:
>On 23/03/2016 12:22, Frank Villaro-Dixon wrote:
>>On 16-03-23 12:20:35, Andy Townsend, wrote 0.3K characters saying:
>>>On 23/03/2016 12:07, Frank Villaro-Dixon wrote:
>>>>Again, that's not the goal if it. As said above, the role is NOT 
>>>>to change
>>>>tags, but to remove redundancies.
>>>
>>>It doesn't matter.  All of the screed that I wrote yesterday 
>>>applies to "redundant data" too - we need to understand how it got 
>>>there, and what actually is wrong.
>>
>>Yep,
>>as I said on another mail:
>
>Link please.  You've said lots of things, but much seemed very "handwavy" 
>and not really understanding of the issues.
TODO
>
>>the majority comes from two 'bad' imports.
>
>Link please - exactly which ones, run by whom and when?
Complete list (generated by me; source on git) is here:
http://pastebin.com/Cn7gyn76

Statistics are here:
http://pastebin.com/KrZWJY6j


Extract:
     16 CanVec_Import_2009
     16 PGS & Bing
     22 PGS
     23 Yahoo
     36 CANVEC
     38 JOSM lakewalker plugin
     39 bing
     39 Lakewalker / Landsat
     44 KSJ2
     54 Landsat
     56 CanVec 6.0 - NRCan
     57 IRS
     63 NRCan-CanVec-8.0
    118 landsat
    121 Bing
    123 NRCan-CanVec-7.0
    437 Kartverket N50
    802 NRCan-CanVec-10.0
   1476
   1708 NHD


We can see that of the 5477 ways that need modification, half of them 
(1708 + 802 + 437 + 123 + 63 = 57% of 5477) were created by automated 
imports.


Cheers,

Frank

-- 
frank.villaro-dixon.eu       - PGP: 6F36914A
Envie d'électricité 100% verte ? Enercoop.fr
What is a Velomobile ?   www.sans-essence.eu