[OSM-talk] Missing Background Layers

[Simon Poole]

Am 08.01.2016 um 23:25 schrieb tony wroblewski:
> Silly question, why would you trace from Mapnik, since it's OSM anyway?

There are many reasons why you might want to use a non-imagery
background (or overlay which essentially all have gone too), for example
large scale orientation or highlighting specific features, editing in
areas without useful areial imagery and so on.

Simon
>
> On 8 January 2016 at 23:13, Steve Doerr <doerr.stephen at gmail.com> wrote:
>> When editing in Potlatch 2, the list of background layers seems rather
>> short. In particular, Mapnik (the default style) is not on the list.
>>
>> Bug? Or change of policy?
>>
>> --
>> Steve
>>
>> ---
>> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
>> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> talk mailing list
>> talk at openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> talk at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 473 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20160108/6d63a469/attachment.sig>