[OSM-talk] Missing Background Layers

Steve Doerr doerr.stephen at gmail.com
Sat Jan 16 16:41:39 UTC 2016


On 08/01/2016 22:34, Simon Poole wrote:
> Am 08.01.2016 um 23:25 schrieb tony wroblewski:
>> Silly question, why would you trace from Mapnik, since it's OSM anyway?
> There are many reasons why you might want to use a non-imagery
> background (or overlay which essentially all have gone too), for example
> large scale orientation or highlighting specific features, editing in
> areas without useful areial imagery and so on.
>
> Simon
>

Yes, indeed.

So, could we have our background layers back, please?

-- 
Steve

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus




More information about the talk mailing list