[OSM-talk] Missing Background Layers

[Warin]

On 17/01/2016 3:41 AM, Steve Doerr wrote:
> On 08/01/2016 22:34, Simon Poole wrote:
>> Am 08.01.2016 um 23:25 schrieb tony wroblewski:
>>> Silly question, why would you trace from Mapnik, since it's OSM anyway?
I use it to check the OSM data relative to another image without down 
loading the data ...
So I am not tracing but visual error/accuracy/missing checks.
>> There are many reasons why you might want to use a non-imagery
>> background (or overlay which essentially all have gone too), for example
>> large scale orientation or highlighting specific features, editing in
>> areas without useful areial imagery and so on.
>>
>> Simon
>>
>
> Yes, indeed.
>
> So, could we have our background layers back, please?
>