[OSM-talk] Automated edits code of conduct

Michael Reichert nakaner at gmx.net
Thu Jul 14 15:38:51 UTC 2016

Hi Eric,

Am 14.07.2016 um 17:19 schrieb Éric Gillet:
> However I'd believe that there is (in Europe for the example's sake) a very
> low number of restaurant really named McDonalds and not part of the
> franchise. So if the changeset correct 300 restaurants but 2 are "damaged"
> by the automated edit, would the edit be bad enough to be reverted or not
> be done in the first place ?

A mechanical edit must not cause damage. Therefore a mechanical edit
which has damaged some data (damage > 0) should be reverted.

Best regards


Per E-Mail kommuniziere ich bevorzugt GPG-verschlüsselt. (Mailinglisten
I prefer GPG encryption of emails. (does not apply on mailing lists)

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20160714/ddd0517c/attachment-0001.sig>

More information about the talk mailing list