[OSM-talk] highway=crossing tags removed in changeset.

Dave F davefoxfac63 at btinternet.com
Tue Jul 19 17:14:54 UTC 2016


It strikes me that it's you whose "at war"



On 19/07/2016 14:48, Greg Morgan wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 6:26 AM, Dave F <davefoxfac63 at btinternet.com> wrote:
>> On 19/07/2016 14:01, Greg Morgan wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 5:38 AM, Dave F <davefoxfac63 at btinternet.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> ...Two wrongs don't make a right.
>>> And yet you persist at your war.
>>
>>>     We are an open
>>> source project that should be building on each other's work.  I agree
>>> that the tagging is wrong in the original and the change.  I disagree
>>> with how you are handling the situation.  The better way forward is
>>> not a revert the change but to change the tagging to highway=crossing;
>>> crossing=unmarked;
>>
>> How do you know they're unmarked?
>>
> The long story short is that there is a node that is tagged that can
> be built upon.  Even with the current tagging that Wynnham added or
> removed, there is a node to build upon.  Add just the FIXME tag to the
> current tagging. I don't care. The big sledge hammer approach to your
> fellow mapper is what I care about.
>
>
>> Reverting will reinsert the highway=crossing to all tags in one go.
>>
>>> FIXME=Please adjust this crossing by adding other
>>> tags or changing the crossing tag.
>>
>> That's the same as asking on Talk-gb for users to check which, I suspect,
>> will have a higher hit rate.
> Right to the end you have this precision that no one else can match.
> Look at all the energy that you spent on correctness and continue to
> do so.




More information about the talk mailing list