[OSM-talk] Failed water proposal reversal

Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdreist at gmail.com
Mon Jun 20 09:11:23 UTC 2016


2016-06-20 10:48 GMT+02:00 Christoph Hormann <chris_hormann at gmx.de>:

> If you want to do something productive you could clean up the frequent
> occurences of duplicate and sometimes contradicting tags on member ways
> and multipolygon relations for river mapping.  One of the problems of
> the waterway=riverbank tag is that it was originally meant and is
> widely understood to be a way tag while today it should normally be
> applied to the multipolygons relation.  Cleaning up such ambiguities -
> not mechanically as it has been suggested in the past but with
> individual verification - using either waterway=riverbank or
> natural=water + water=river would be a very good deed.
>


I'd like to add to this that on a semantic / natural language level,
waterway=riverbank (deliberately ignoring long standing, widespread use and
acceptance) would seem to indicate a riverbank, i.e. the bank of a river,
or in other words, the area along a river, which will occassionally but not
always be flooded.

I am at this point not proposing to remap all of these (unless there would
be compelling agreement by many mappers), as this is a longstanding, very
widespread tag (293.000 occurences, 31.700 of them relations) with
supposedly uniform usage, but it should be noted that there are issues with
it on a logical level.

Cheers,
Martin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20160620/450922ea/attachment.html>


More information about the talk mailing list