[OSM-talk] Failed water proposal reversal

[Christoph Hormann]

On Monday 20 June 2016, Tomas Straupis wrote:
> >
> > If you want to eliminate use of water=* from OSM you'd need to
> > convince the community of this.  A formal proposal can be used but
> > without convincing arguments on the matter this stands little
> > chance in being approved.
>
>   I do not want to „eliminate“ water=*
>   I want to go back to the situation before the water proposal - with
> landuse=reservoir, waterway=riverbank, landuse=basin, etc. etc. As it
> used to be, and as it was and is still being mapped.

You need to decide if you want to abolish the water=* or if you just 
prefer using waterway=riverbank instead of natural=water + 
water=river - which does not in any way conflict with the water=* tag.

-- 
Christoph Hormann
http://www.imagico.de/