[OSM-talk] Finding duplicate cycleways

[Michael Andersen]

On onsdag den 26. april 2017 07.22.27 CEST Ture Pålsson wrote:
> > 25 apr. 2017 kl. 21:52 skrev Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com>:
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > sent from a phone
> > 
> > On 25. Apr 2017, at 19:07, Tobias Zwick <osm at westnordost.de 
<mailto:osm at westnordost.de>> wrote:
> >> I would say so, as long as there are not in reality two cycleways (see
> >> above). Wouldn't you?
> > 
> > it depends on the meaning/reading. I believe cycleway=track is bad anyway,
> > it's ok for preliminary mapping but fails when it comes to […]
> On a side note, around where I live I see quite a few cycleways mapped as
> their own ways, tagged highway=cycleway,cycleway=track. Does the
> cycleway=track mean anything in this context (and if so: what?) or is it a
> mapping error?

In that context it's a mistake. Also in my opinion cycleway=track is not bad.