[OSM-talk] Finding duplicate cycleways

Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdreist at gmail.com
Thu Apr 27 08:30:46 UTC 2017


2017-04-27 10:21 GMT+02:00 joost schouppe <joost.schouppe at gmail.com>:

> There are very good arguments for both sides of this discussion.




I forgot another two pro distinct geometry:

4. consistency. There is a general rule that separate carriageways should
be mapped separately. Why would we do it everywhere but on cycleways?

5. ideology. Why would we prefer cars, lorries and motorbikes over
bicycles? We could just as well map the road as an attribute of the
cycleway. road=track on a highway=cycleway. This would make it easier for
renderers to get the distance between the road and the cycleway right and
could help prevent overlapping cycleways and roads.


Yes, there are arguments for both ways of mapping, but as long as we don't
prefer one over the other, mappers will edit back and forth without much
sense.

Cheers,
Martin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20170427/de9e93c6/attachment.html>


More information about the talk mailing list