[OSM-talk] DWG redaction and Autometed edits code of conduct

Yves yvecai at gmail.com
Sun Aug 27 18:52:07 UTC 2017



Le 27 août 2017 20:37:18 GMT+02:00, Greg Morgan <dr.kludge.gm at gmail.com> a écrit :
>On Sun, Aug 27, 2017 at 10:29 AM, Ian Dees <ian.dees at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Aug 27, 2017 11:58, "Yves" <yvecai at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> <ian.dees at gmail.com> a écrit :
>>
>>
>> Frederik,
>>
>>
>> Thanks for notifying us about this. I hope that you treat this as an
>> import or automated edit and follow the rules you would expect to see
>the
>> rest of the community follow
>>
>>
>> Ian,
>> To lessen the burden of the DWG, I would say that this thread is
>> sufficient to document the redaction, plus whatever documentation the
>DWG
>> usually make.
>>
>>
>> I strongly disagree. As a group of people who have received
>extra-judicial
>> powers in the OSM community, they should be expected to follow
>community
>> guidelines to a higher degree than the rest of the community.
>>
>
>I agree with Ian.  Yves what about the DWG lessening the burden on
>mappers?

I would say that to me, it's a strange way of thinking, the same for Ian comment. 
Could you both elaborate on this, what made you think these ways about the DWG work? 
Yves 



More information about the talk mailing list