[OSM-talk] DWG redaction and Autometed edits code of conduct
yvecai at gmail.com
Sun Aug 27 18:52:07 UTC 2017
Le 27 août 2017 20:37:18 GMT+02:00, Greg Morgan <dr.kludge.gm at gmail.com> a écrit :
>On Sun, Aug 27, 2017 at 10:29 AM, Ian Dees <ian.dees at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Aug 27, 2017 11:58, "Yves" <yvecai at gmail.com> wrote:
>> <ian.dees at gmail.com> a écrit :
>> Thanks for notifying us about this. I hope that you treat this as an
>> import or automated edit and follow the rules you would expect to see
>> rest of the community follow
>> To lessen the burden of the DWG, I would say that this thread is
>> sufficient to document the redaction, plus whatever documentation the
>> usually make.
>> I strongly disagree. As a group of people who have received
>> powers in the OSM community, they should be expected to follow
>> guidelines to a higher degree than the rest of the community.
>I agree with Ian. Yves what about the DWG lessening the burden on
I would say that to me, it's a strange way of thinking, the same for Ian comment.
Could you both elaborate on this, what made you think these ways about the DWG work?
More information about the talk