[OSM-talk] OSM then and now revived
Maarten Deen
mdeen at xs4all.nl
Mon Jan 30 11:26:51 UTC 2017
On 2017-01-30 12:07, Simon Poole wrote:
> I suspect the main problem is that in 2007 we didn't really have a lot
> of data so rendering tiles or it is really not such a big issue.
> However 2010 and later would require per point in time a rather
> largish rendering DB plus space for tiles a model that neither scales
> nor would seem to be a particular good use of resources.
You could mitigate that in the future by making a copy of the current
tileset at a fixed point (1st of january for example).
But I agree that it would need quite some space for a gimmick. But with
Seagate announcing 16TB drives and prices of drives dropping steadily, I
assume this argument will be laughed at in 5 years time.
Regards,
Maarten
>
> Am 30.01.2017 um 11:04 schrieb Martijn van Exel:
>
>> My poor little tile server machine doesn’t have the storage for
>> that, but it would sure be cool to set this up for more points in
>> time. The server itself is not hard to get up and running, although
>> I did find the instructions on switch2osm to be out of date. I
>> followed the instructions here:
>>
> https://www.linuxbabe.com/linux-server/openstreetmap-tile-server-ubuntu-16-04.
>> The only extra step was to download osmosis 0.35 and convert the 0.5
>> planet to 0.6. For older planets you’d need to come up with a way
>> to convert 0.3 / 0.4 planets to 0.6. There is a script to convert
>> from 0.4 to 0.5 but I don’t know of anything that can handle 0.3
>> planets.
>>
>> Martijn van Exel
>>
>> On Jan 28, 2017, at 5:08 PM, joost schouppe
>> <joost.schouppe at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Any chance we'll see some middle version there too in the future?
>> (say, 2012. And than later, 1/1/20**)
>>
>> You gave us a finger, let me grab your entire arm :)
>>
>> 2017-01-26 23:17 GMT+01:00 Martijn van Exel <m at rtijn.org>:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I resuscitated the OSM then and now service, where you can compare
>> OSM as it was in October 2007 with now.
>> The service is a bit slow because 2007 tiles above z10 are not
>> pre-rendered. This will improve as tiles get cached.
>> Here is the location of SOTM 2016 as an example:
>> http://mvexel.github.io/thenandnow/#15/50.8178/4.3971 [1]
>>
>> Martijn van Exel
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> talk mailing list
>> talk at openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk [2]
>>
>> --
>>
>> Joost Schouppe
>> OpenStreetMap [3] | Twitter [4] | LinkedIn [5] | Meetup [6]
>
> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> talk at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>
>
>
> Links:
> ------
> [1] http://mvexel.github.io/thenandnow/#15/50.8178/4.3971
> [2] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
> [3] http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/joost%20schouppe/
> [4] https://twitter.com/joostjakob
> [5] https://www.linkedin.com/pub/joost-schouppe/48/939/603
> [6] http://www.meetup.com/OpenStreetMap-Belgium/members/97979802/
> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> talk at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
More information about the talk
mailing list