[OSM-talk] Untagged Nodes and Ways
john whelan
jwhelan0112 at gmail.com
Mon Jan 30 13:51:30 UTC 2017
>
I think a hint like JOSM presents you when you try to upload an untagged
way or node (that aren't part of a relation either) should be sufficient. I
wouldn't reject those ways by the api. There might also be some sense in
this, e.g. when working on big things a mapper might want to upload part of
his work before it is finished, to continue work on it later.
Well yes but how long do you wait?
Cheerio John
On 30 January 2017 at 07:19, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com>
wrote:
>
> 2017-01-30 11:16 GMT+01:00 Rory McCann <rory at technomancy.org>:
>
>> > I would be interested in hearing from you why we should ever allow
>> > untagged ways to be uploaded.
>>
>> Well, to be pedantically correct*, many untagged ways are members of
>> relations which have tags.
>
>
>
> I think a hint like JOSM presents you when you try to upload an untagged
> way or node (that aren't part of a relation either) should be sufficient. I
> wouldn't reject those ways by the api. There might also be some sense in
> this, e.g. when working on big things a mapper might want to upload part of
> his work before it is finished, to continue work on it later.
>
> Cheers,
> Martin
>
> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> talk at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20170130/379ee621/attachment.html>
More information about the talk
mailing list