[OSM-talk] OSM Note 1000000

[Florian Lohoff]

On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 11:17:00AM +0100, Dave F wrote:
> On 26/05/2017 09:43, Florian Lohoff wrote:
> >So who is at fault? The one mentioning somethings missing - or the one
> >putting some information into the map without closing the note?
> 
> I think you're missing the point. There are a large number of
> pointless notes, such as mentioning things which *aren't* missing,
> or ones such as this, added today:
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1008125#c2036202
> 
> We have no way of communicating with this person to ask them to stop
> or confirm they're intentions.

Instead of complaining and continuing the bullshit - close it? Its a
single click - easy as it is ...  We want the feedback and the barrier
should be low - accept a bad signal to noise ratio - dont take notes
with a number as serious ...

Flo
-- 
Florian Lohoff                                                 f at zz.de
             UTF-8 Test: The 🐈 ran after a 🐁, but the 🐁 ran away
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 828 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20170526/e11ff686/attachment.sig>