[OSM-talk] Woods vs Forests

[Martin Koppenhoefer]

2017-10-31 22:35 GMT+01:00 Warin <61sundowner at gmail.com>:

> On 01-Nov-17 02:26 AM, Christian Rogel wrote:
>
> "Landuse=forest" may remain for large forests off the inhabited places.
>
>
> No!
>
> Only if the tree area is to be used for the production of material for
> human use.
>
> IF not then it is not a 'land use' but a 'land cover' and should not be
> tagged 'landuse'.
>


what kind of material qualifies? Isn't the production of oxygen from
carbondioxide something we all rely on?

Cheers,
Martin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20171101/ad212e34/attachment.html>