[OSM-talk] New OSM Quick-Fix service

[Yuri Astrakhan]

JB, try to avoid swearword outburst, not helpful.  Are you taking issue
with the word "deprecated"?   The proper word should probably have been
"unnecessary" to discuss the layer=0, per JOSM's naming:
https://josm.openstreetmap.de/browser/josm/trunk/data/validator/unnecessary.mapcss

The wiki deprecation only lists one =no:  highway=no, but we are not
discussing that one yet --
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Deprecated_features

I used the word "deprecated" in a more general term, to mean anything that
community has decided to phase out, such as JOSM autofixes and deprecation
list.

I have no   clue what you meant otherwise about mixing issues. I am
attempting to answer every possible question being raised. So far there has
been a few very constructive and helpful emails, and lots of sidetracks. If
you want to stay focused, re-read my initial post, as well as my most
latest post with the new tool capabilities, or just read the Sophox wiki
page and try to follow the style of Simon & Tobias - both have raised valid
objections, and in both cases it resulted in tool's improvements.

On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 3:05 AM, JB <jbosm at mailoo.org> wrote:

> Le 13/11/2017 à 01:16, Yuri Astrakhan a écrit :
>
>> You are right that =0 and =no seem like nobrainers, but if we have listed
>> them as deprecated, we should not use them.
>>
> Deprecated? Where did you find that?
> (Swearwords somewhere here. Did someone already said that you mix issues?)
>
> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> talk at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20171113/1078f275/attachment.html>