[OSM-talk] Name challenge - what to call the new OSM+Wikidata service?

[Oleksiy Muzalyev]

It is not bad. But it is centered on two data bases - the Wikidata and 
the OSM. What if in the future there will be more open data sources 
readily available?

Say, a query to listen to an audio-book or listen to music written in a 
certain city, view vacancies, see paintings from museums in a region, 
aerial images of an area, etc.

If synergy, the creation of a whole that is greater than the simple sum 
of its parts, is possible for two parts, then it may be possible for 
more parts too.

Oleksiy

On 9/18/2017 5:13 PM, Janko Mihelić wrote:
> I like WOQ. Or maybe WOQL to continue with the SQL, SparQL, MySQL and 
> so on. Wok imagery seems nice too.
>
> Janko
>
> pon, 18. ruj 2017. u 09:00 Oleksiy Muzalyev 
> <oleksiy.muzalyev at bluewin.ch <mailto:oleksiy.muzalyev at bluewin.ch>> 
> napisao je:
>
>     Wikipedia is not only about data directly related to the map, it
>     is also
>     about mathematics, music, astronomy, etc.  But these disciplines
>     certainly have a relation to a map via places of birth, study, etc.
>     So what if to continue the traditions of:
>     MySQL
>     PostgresSQL
>     SparQL
>     Transact-SQL
>     etc.
>
>     Those who worked with a SQL Structured Query Language know what a
>     powerful tool it is. The Wikipedia (Wikidata) describes the
>     universe as
>     we on Earth know it. So my suggestion:
>
>     UniverSQL
>     or a short final variant:
>     U-SQL
>
>     Univers is the French variant of the english word Universe (lat.
>     Universum).
>     Best regards,
>     Oleksiy
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     talk mailing list
>     talk at openstreetmap.org <mailto:talk at openstreetmap.org>
>     https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20170918/21d08c58/attachment.html>