[OSM-talk] Fixing wiki* -> brand:wiki*
frederik at remote.org
Wed Sep 27 13:59:34 UTC 2017
On 27.09.2017 15:37, Simon Poole wrote:
> My take is that it adds a nearly impossible to maintain (consider your
> own Woolworth's example), non-speaking, foreign key
We generally discourage foreign keys (that are only usable together with
a different data set and that are not signposted locally).
When Wikidata keys were first added to OSM, I thought this was something
limited to place names of a certain importance and I didn't object.
Seeing that this now leads to the automatic assumption that Wikidata IDs
are practically admissible *everywhere* where Wikidata has defined an
ID, I am having second thoughts about the whole issue.
In theory, almost everything we map could be expressed by a Wikidata ID.
If welcoming a Wikidata link on a city place node means that by
extension I also have to welcome "amenity:wikidata=Q123456" on something
that is, say, an ice cream parlour because Q123456 is the generic
Wikidata category for ice cream parlours, then I think I'd rather not
have any Wikidata links in OSM at all.
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frederik at remote.org ## N49°00'09" E008°23'33"
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 473 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
More information about the talk