[OSM-talk] Community Data License Agreement – Permissive and ODbL?

Kathleen Lu kathleen.lu at mapbox.com
Wed Aug 22 18:17:14 UTC 2018


Ah, but wouldn't the alternative be for OSM to be under the LF
umbrella/decrees, and we couldn't have that, you and I would be out of a
job, Simon ;)

On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 6:08 PM Simon Poole <simon at poole.ch> wrote:

> WOF as a OSM compeitor.
>
> Am 22.08.2018 um 20:06 schrieb Kathleen Lu:
>
>
> > PS: long diatribe on why on earth the linux foundation is supporting an
>> > OSM competitor not included.
>>
>> mmm... this is not good.
>> Do you know the reasons?
>>
>
> Simon - did you mean an OSM competitor or an ODbL competitor?
>
> (Best I know from various rumors is that various big companies wanted a
> LF-blessed open data license and they had things they did not like about
> ODbL.)
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20180822/e7ac66f0/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the talk mailing list