[OSM-talk] [Osmf-talk] Candidate's views? Re: Board decision on Crimea complaint

Imre Samu pella.samu at gmail.com
Tue Dec 11 16:27:58 UTC 2018


> Vector tiles and customizable styling is not enough.
> So we still need to represent the various viewpoints on disputed borders
and territories within the OSM database itself

agree,   (  sorry,  I am not good at communication. :)    )

as I wrote:

Imho: an important part of the solution:
-  openstreetmap.org vector maps.  ( so we can customize the borders,
languages for  the end users, communities )
-  improved admin border tagging
-  more communication,  adapting the rules for the current political
situations.

And I trust in DWG.





Eugene Alvin Villar <seav80 at gmail.com> ezt írta (időpont: 2018. dec. 11.,
K, 16:41):

> On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 10:02 PM Imre Samu <pella.samu at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> TLDR:  We need focusing for the customizable vector tiles for the next
>> year!    (  Less community fighting - more working on the real problems!  )
>>
>
> Vector tiles and customizable styling is not enough. AFAIK, we never use
> 3rd-party data (except for the public domain Natural Earth data for the
> lower zoom levels, IIRC) when rendering the default tile layer on the OSM.
> So we still need to represent the various viewpoints on disputed borders
> and territories within the OSM database itself if you want that level of
> flexibility on the default tile layer(s). There are already a couple or so
> threads on the Tagging mailing list discussing various tagging solutions
> for representing these viewpoints and disputes.
>
> ~Eugene
> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> talk at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20181211/f523f991/attachment.html>


More information about the talk mailing list