[OSM-talk] what can be mapped - temporary, pernament and reoccuring

[Mateusz Konieczny]

25. May 2018 20:17 by frederik at remote.org <mailto:frederik at remote.org>:


> I think the key here is, like so often, verifiability. Things in OSM
> must be verifiable, and I'd like to add "... with reasonable effort by
> an average person". If something is verifiable only with expensive
> special gear by a person with a doctorate in physics, then maybe OSM is
> not the place. Same with recurring things - if their frequency is so low
> that the effort to verify them becomes unreasonable, then don't map.
>




I completely agree with that.


 


> My gut feeling is that something that happens once a week is reasonably
> easy to verify. Something that happens once a month, mmh, maybe ok.
> Something that happens once a year is, in my opinion, too hard to verify
> and should be left out.
>




I would expect limit somewhere between "once a month" and "once a year".

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20180525/9ad8c1af/attachment.html>