[OSM-talk] problems with differential update?

Simon Poole simon at poole.ch
Fri Apr 12 09:03:49 UTC 2019


Am 12.04.2019 um 10:16 schrieb Maarten Deen:
> On 2019-04-12 09:52, Simon Poole wrote:
>> Am 12.04.2019 um 08:26 schrieb Maarten Deen:
>>> Does the determination in java follow the same rules (or even the same
>>> library) as file(1)? In its manpage it says
>>>> file tests each argument in an attempt to classify it. There are
>>>> three sets of tests, performed in this order: filesystem tests, magic
>>>> tests, and language tests. The first test that succeeds causes the
>>>> file type to be printed.
>>> Is there any similarity in the first bytes of the zipped file?
>> This would be a valid question except: I hardwired the decompression
>> type to GZip yesterday in a test version of osmosis and still got the
>> error and as said a test program using the same methods decompresses the
>> file just fine.
> That is interesting. I don't know how the unzipping is done in
> osmosis, but if it is still a java call (now hardwired to use gzip, I
> assume the executable, not a built in library), could it not be that
> java still tries to figure out what kind of file it is and fails
> because of that?
> Regards,
> Maarten

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20190412/9705691a/attachment.sig>

More information about the talk mailing list