[OSM-talk] `computer_vision_assisted=yes` changeset tag?

Philip Barnes phil at trigpoint.me.uk
Wed Aug 7 13:31:48 UTC 2019

On Wednesday, 7 August 2019, marc marc wrote:
> Hello,
>  > “This edit was assisted by computer vision”
>  > is useful metadata, no?
> I use a lot of such datas (traffic sign from mapillary via osmose)
> I review it (viewing the picture myself) before any change to avoid some 
> false positive and to improve localisation.
> who 'll made what if I add computer_vision_assisted changeset tag ?
> for stat ? why not.
> but in this case, it may also be needed to add humain_reviewed,
> humain_improved, integration_tools and so...
> currently I put source=mapillary source:date
> I see a lot of mappers unable to fill a source tag,
> for ex because a major editor doesn't promote enought a changeset
> source tag. it would probably be best to start by having at least
> the source tag everywhere before pushing for more secondary tags
I agree, mapillary can detect all sorts of temporary signs such as speed limits through roadworks meaning they will always require a human with local knowledge to review.

Phil (trigpoint)

Sent from my Sailfish device

More information about the talk mailing list