[OSM-talk] Attribution guideline status update

[Nuno Caldeira]

Oh right that sounds fair...not.

Same applies to this https://janaodaparaabastecer.vost.pt/ theres Mapbox 
logo, there's VOST logo, then under  "i" crap load of sources...oh yeh 
that's OSM for sure, i know my edits well. clearly the 50% rule needs to 
be removed from the guidance as users are using already in a misleading 
way. And again another Mapbox tied map.


Às 11:58 de 10/08/2019, Andrew Harvey escreveu:
> On Sat, 10 Aug 2019 at 17:27, Joseph Eisenberg 
> <joseph.eisenberg at gmail.com <mailto:joseph.eisenberg at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     It's even hard to recommend apps like Maps.me when they don't
>     attribute Openstreetmap, instead putting their own logo in the lower
>     right corner.
>
>     If people don't know that OSM is the source of the data in a map, they
>     won't know how to get involved to improve it.
>
>
> They do provide the attribution, tt's under Settings | About (then 
> again under Settings | About | Copyright).
>
> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> talk at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20190810/0d3bcac2/attachment.html>