[OSM-talk] OpenStreetMap Carto release v4.22.0

[Yves]

Oleksiy,
Those two changes are indeed very technical and are not related to mapping.
https://postgis.net/docs/ST_PointOnSurface.html

https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/3756

Yves

Le 28 août 2019 08:13:13 GMT+02:00, Oleksiy Muzalyev <oleksiy.muzalyev at bluewin.ch> a écrit :
>Good morning,
>
>Thank you for the information.
>
>I did not understand these two changes. I would like to see an example 
>on the map or/and read a wiki article about the building label, the
>shop 
>label, and the ST_PointOnSurface.
>
>In the two following articles:
>
>https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop
>https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Shops
>https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building
>
>there is neither word "label", nor "ST_PointOnSurface". I would like to
>
>learn about it and, probably, use it.
>
>As for layers with attachments, - I guess it does not concern mapping 
>itself, but it's something related to a technical side of rendering. 
>Probably, a layer has got some PNG image files, which are used in icons
>
>or displaying certain areas, and they will be cached in the visitors' 
>browsers.
>
>Best regards,
>Oleksiy (Alex-7 @ OSM)
>
>On 8/28/19 06:57, Paul Norman via talk wrote:
>>
>> Changes include
>>
>> - Shop label fixes and use ST_PointOnSurface for building label
>placement
>>
>>   This fixes some bugs and makes building label placement consistent 
>> with shop
>>   label placement.
>>
>> - Use `cache-feature: true` to improve performance of layers with 
>> attachments
>> ...
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>talk mailing list
>talk at openstreetmap.org
>https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20190828/df9bcdb7/attachment.html>