[OSM-talk] [Osmf-talk] Attribution guideline status update

[Nuno Caldeira]

hi Pierre,

I have tried that route multiple times in twitter, they will ignore. as
they ignore emails (even if you CC legal at osmfoundation.org), the license,
the mailing list.
if you can read the attribution clearly here let me know
https://twitter.com/iamnunocaldeira/status/1207927051669397504?s=19 this is
not manipulated or cropped, straight out of the app.

On Fri, 20 Dec 2019, 00:14 Pierre Béland, <pierzenh at yahoo.fr> wrote:

> Hi Nuno,
>
> How can we react positively suggesting to take care obout OSM attribution
> ? This is an international media and we can benefit by having a bit of fun.
>
> Plus this is Christmas coming soon and we need to think positive !
>
> You could make tweet to https://twitter.com/BBCTwo   + using
> OpenStreetMap logo image (add @OpenStreetMap as who is on the image) + url
> link to facebook article
> saying
>
> *Merry Christmas from the OpenStreetMap community Happy to provide
> accurate and detailed maps to news medias, governnments, research,
> business, consumers, to respond to disasters, etc.  Dont forget - Our New
> Year Best Wishes to have more impact - OpenStreetMap Contributors
> attribution :)*
>
> Then you could invite OSM contributors on the discussion lists to make it
> Viral by responding !
>
> To show OSM diversity, I would be pleased to respond to the tweet.
>
>
> *Bonne année, Pierre Béland, du Québec, Canada, fier de supporter
> OpenStreetMap.*
>
> ;)
>
>
> Pierre
>
>
> Le jeudi 19 décembre 2019 18 h 16 min 44 s UTC−5, Nuno Caldeira <
> nunocapelocaldeira at gmail.com> a écrit :
>
>
> here's another lovely example from BBC TWO using Strava (i can spot the
> Mapbox logo, not the reasonable calculated ©OpenStreetMap contributors).
> glad BBC attributed Google properly. they probably aren't aware it's
> OpenStreetMap, if they can't read the attribution on Strava
> https://www.facebook.com/413132078795966/posts/2468472903261863/
>
> On Fri, 1 Nov 2019, 18:59 Nuno Caldeira, <nunocapelocaldeira at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Fri, 1 Nov 2019, 18:05 Simon Poole, <simon at poole.ch> wrote:
>
> The fair use point just turned up to illustrate that there are limits on
> what we can expect copyright to do for us (aka the tweets from private
> individuals showing a map excerpt that Nuno pointed to) and there is no
> point in getting upset over that there are such limitations.
>
> actually Simon those prints indivuals share on social media is sent to
> their emails by the company (as someone pointed after you writing). Strava
> sends emails of OSM basemap to their users without attribution.
> I been testing Strava app today and had a couple of laughts TB. tYhere's
> even more interesting stuff we should take notice when doing the
> attribution guidance. they use Google maps on their android app, the routes
> they display clearly isn't from their users (it's not GPS traces as it is
> impossible to have no overlaping traces on mountain regions). I'm sure
> these routes are from OSM and I'm gathering evidence from my contributions
> that this is OSM data. I will get back to it when I get home and record a
> video with clear evidence that it is impossible to be their users GPS trace
> or Google Maps (as they do not have data in that regions). That could only
> come from OSM and I'm sure as I added that data and weekly monitor the
> editing and their suggested routes sometimes overlap the same route as it
> displayed different versions of OSM data during the years.
>
> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> talk at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20191220/fc9b6e4c/attachment.html>